Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Don't worry, I'm getting enough protein...

I eat almost NO meat, eggs, or dairy and people ask me all the time if I think I'm getting enough protein in my diet. If you have the same concern then just take a few minutes and read this

http://www.greensmoothiegirl.com/nutrition-manifesto/plant-protein-source/

Protein: Are We Deficient? Or Overdosing?


Myth #1: “People need 20% protein—and animal protein is best.”

The idea that beef, chicken, fish and other animal products are the “best” source of protein is ingrained in the American psyche because of very successful work on the part of the multibillion-dollar cattle and dairy industries. They have immeasurable help from the fact that bodybuilders can show impressive bulk as a result of eating “quality” animal proteins. The plant protein source is, in fact, superior.
People are surprised to learn that vegetables have plenty of protein. To believe that, you have to let go of the idea of 20 percent protein being good and necessary—Colin Campbell’s animal studies in The China StudyThe China Study, and then his largest human nutrition study ever conducted, documented that a 20 percent animal protein diet leads to all the modern degenerative diseases.
Campbell noted that rats fed 20 percent casein (cow-milk protein) developed cancerous tumors and died early, while those fed 5 percent casein were lean and vigorous beyond their life expectancy. When the diets of the two groups were switched, Campbell and other researchers around the world repeatedly got consistent results. Formerly lean animals developed tumors and died on a high-protein diet. And the tumors of overweight, cancer-ridden animals disappeared and life expectancy increased when they were switched to low-protein feed.
I used to lease a Pharmanex Biophotonic Scanner, and in the course of a year scanned 10,000 people nationwide for the carotenoid antioxidant levels in their skin, which is the nutritional endpoint of the body. The average American scans at 20,000. I scan at 70,000, which is above the 99th percentile and off the top end of the chart (as you would expect, virtually all raw foodists I measured scan at 50,000 or above). I scanned cancer patients who were below 10,000 (and we therefore could not get a reading). And despite doing a lot of work in gyms, I never once scanned a bodybuilder even as high as the national average! They were, on average, not much higher than the cancer patients. Their animal-protein diets may create a bulked-up appearance, but I’m more concerned about their long-term health.
Vegetables tend to have 9-10 percent protein. (Broccoli and spinach, however, have more than 40 percent protein, and my Best Whole Food Green Drink has the best green sources of protein on the planet, spirulina and chlorella algaes, with 58-60 percent protein.)
The China Study’s conclusion was that Americans are actually suffering from massive protein overload. My cancer research is yielding conclusions of a variety of experts in orthomolecular medicine (utilizing nutrition) including the Gerson Institute and the Ann Wigmore Institute that undigested animal proteins in the gut and in the bloodstream, are at the root of cancer, heart disease, and auto-immune diseases. We simply cannot digest all the protein we flood our systems with. Minimizing carbs and maximizing protein is nothing more or better than a fad—and it’s a damaging one.
The World Health Organization, even, states that 5 percent protein is actually ideal. In order to achieve the 20 percent pushed on us by food faddists Robert Atkins, Barry Sears, South Beach Diet, etc., we have to eat lots of animals (it takes 20 lbs. of plants to produce 1 lb. of animal flesh) or eat highly processed, synthetic vitamin-fortified low-nutrition whey or soy protein powders and bars.
People often say they know sickly vegans to justify daily meat eating as a good lifestyle choice. But of course, not all vegans eat good nutrition: they don’t eat meat, but they might eat cotton candy for breakfast! Have you ever seen a sickly gorilla? He eats plants all day.
Stephen Arlin, author of Raw Power!, is a 17-yr. vegan raw-foodist, as well as a rocked-up, 6’2”, 225-lb. bodybuilder. Bill Pearl is a vegetarian who won four Mr. Universe bodybuilder titles. Arnold Schwarzenegger said, “Bill Pearl never talked me into becoming a vegetarian, but he did convince me that a vegetarian could become a champion body builder.”
A “quality” protein or “perfect” protein (animal flesh that matches human flesh closely) isn’t the same thing as “good” protein, as Campbell discusses extensively in The China Study. Your body can assemble all the amino acids from a plant protein source to create more quality muscle mass that does not break down quickly like that in heavy-meat-eating athletes.
I inadvertently put Stephen Arlin’s theory and observation that plant-based muscle mass is more enduring to the test recently. I peeled a tendon off my shoulder kickboxing and was forced to take a nine-month break from all weight training while rehabilitating. When I returned (having eaten my long-time, vegetable-intensive and animal-products-minimal diet), I was able to lift my original weight within two weeks and had lost no visible muscle definition.
Perhaps the proof is in the (dairy free, of course) pudding. At 40, I have bone density in the highest percentage category—comparable to a 20-yr. old. My diet has been less than 5 percent animal protein my entire life. I have never drunk a glass of cow milk. (And according to blood and metabolic typing, as well as according to my ethnic origins, I’m a “protein type.” While we do vary somewhat, individually, in our nutritional needs, before you become a “nutritional typing” adherent, remember that these are interesting but new, fairly untested fads in nutrition propagated by a charismatic few.)
Americans have been falsely educated into thinking they won’t get enough protein if they don’t eat meat. In the 1900’s, it was thought that people needed 120 grams of protein daily. In the 90′s, nutritionists recommended about 80 grams a day. Newer research shows we need only about 25 grams.
A clinical study in the Journal of the American Dietetic Association compared amino acids (the building blocks of proteins) in the diets of meat eaters, vegetarians, and vegans. They used a high standard that would cover the needs of pregnant women and growing children. All three diets provided MORE than enough protein, by double or more!
Other studies document that Americans are getting 150% to 400% more protein than they need. You can certainly eat plenty of dairy products (high in calcium) and have a calcium deficiency. How else are we the highest dairy-consuming nation in the world (by double the next-highest country) and also have the highest rate of osteoporosis? Fully half of us over the age of 60 get osteoporosis—and I believe that this already high number will grow dramatically as our soda-drinking youth age. The massive amount of animal protein we eat causes such an acidic state in the body that calcium from the bones is robbed in order to bring the blood and tissues into alkaline balance.
I seem to keep having conversations with powerlifter friends about this topic. I can be pretty persuasive, but getting competitive weight lifters to consider eating less meat and more plant food is like trying to tell a Catholic priest to quit going to Mass. What powerlifters do to build up huge pecs, lats, biceps and triceps muscles might win competitions, but it also accelerates aging, as well as disease risk. This week my friend Roy (who maxes the bench press with 455 lbs.) told me he’s on a 60% protein diet. While he’s thinking of his upcoming competition and fearing the ungodly carbohydrate, I’m thinking of the massive enzyme-draining load on his body.
Fact: Animal flesh and animal products may lead to quick muscle mass, but eating lots of animal flesh is a Faustian bargain: short-term gain for a steep long-term price. Protein powders and bars are a fad designed to increase protein intake beyond healthy ratios. A plant protein source is best and leads to long-lasting, slower-to-build but slower-to-degenerate muscle mass. A typical American 20 percent animal protein diet is linked to cancer, heart disease, autoimmune diseases, and many more risks.
Campbell noted that rats fed 20 percent casein (cow-milk protein) developed cancerous tumors and died early, while those fed 5 percent casein were lean and vigorous beyond their life expectancy. When the diets of the two groups were switched, Campbell and other researchers around the world repeatedly got consistent results. Formerly lean animals developed tumors and died on a high-protein diet. And the tumors of overweight, cancer-ridden animals disappeared and life expectancy increased when they were switched to low-protein feed.
I used to lease a Pharmanex Biophotonic Scanner, and in the course of a year scanned 10,000 people nationwide for the carotenoid antioxidant levels in their skin, which is the nutritional endpoint of the body. The average American scans at 20,000. I scan at 70,000, which is above the 99th percentile and off the top end of the chart (as you would expect, virtually all raw foodists I measured scan at 50,000 or above). I scanned cancer patients who were below 10,000 (and we therefore could not get a reading). And despite doing a lot of work in gyms, I never once scanned a bodybuilder even as high as the national average! They were, on average, not much higher than the cancer patients. Their animal-protein diets may create a bulked-up appearance, but I’m more concerned about their long-term health.
Vegetables tend to have 9-10 percent protein. (Broccoli and spinach, however, have more than 40 percent protein, and my Best Whole Food Green Drink has the best green sources of protein on the planet, spirulina and chlorella algaes, with 58-60 percent protein.)
The China Study’s conclusion was that Americans are actually suffering from massive protein overload. My cancer research is yielding conclusions of a variety of experts in orthomolecular medicine (utilizing nutrition) including the Gerson Institute and the Ann Wigmore Institute that undigested animal proteins in the gut and in the bloodstream, are at the root of cancer, heart disease, and auto-immune diseases. We simply cannot digest all the protein we flood our systems with. Minimizing carbs and maximizing protein is nothing more or better than a fad—and it’s a damaging one.
The World Health Organization, even, states that 5 percent protein is actually ideal. In order to achieve the 20 percent pushed on us by food faddists Robert Atkins, Barry Sears, South Beach Diet, etc., we have to eat lots of animals (it takes 20 lbs. of plants to produce 1 lb. of animal flesh) or eat highly processed, synthetic vitamin-fortified low-nutrition whey or soy protein powders and bars.
People often say they know sickly vegans to justify daily meat eating as a good lifestyle choice. But of course, not all vegans eat good nutrition: they don’t eat meat, but they might eat cotton candy for breakfast! Have you ever seen a sickly gorilla? He eats plants all day.
Stephen Arlin, author of Raw Power!, is a 17-yr. vegan raw-foodist, as well as a rocked-up, 6’2”, 225-lb. bodybuilder. Bill Pearl is a vegetarian who won four Mr. Universe bodybuilder titles. Arnold Schwarzenegger said, “Bill Pearl never talked me into becoming a vegetarian, but he did convince me that a vegetarian could become a champion body builder.”
A “quality” protein or “perfect” protein (animal flesh that matches human flesh closely) isn’t the same thing as “good” protein, as Campbell discusses extensively in The China Study. Your body can assemble all the amino acids from a plant protein source to create more quality muscle mass that does not break down quickly like that in heavy-meat-eating athletes.
I inadvertently put Stephen Arlin’s theory and observation that plant-based muscle mass is more enduring to the test recently. I peeled a tendon off my shoulder kickboxing and was forced to take a nine-month break from all weight training while rehabilitating. When I returned (having eaten my long-time, vegetable-intensive and animal-products-minimal diet), I was able to lift my original weight within two weeks and had lost no visible muscle definition.
Perhaps the proof is in the (dairy free, of course) pudding. At 40, I have bone density in the highest percentage category—comparable to a 20-yr. old. My diet has been less than 5 percent animal protein my entire life. I have never drunk a glass of cow milk. (And according to blood and metabolic typing, as well as according to my ethnic origins, I’m a “protein type.” While we do vary somewhat, individually, in our nutritional needs, before you become a “nutritional typing” adherent, remember that these are interesting but new, fairly untested fads in nutrition propagated by a charismatic few.)
Americans have been falsely educated into thinking they won’t get enough protein if they don’t eat meat. In the 1900’s, it was thought that people needed 120 grams of protein daily. In the 90′s, nutritionists recommended about 80 grams a day. Newer research shows we need only about 25 grams.
A clinical study in the Journal of the American Dietetic Association compared amino acids (the building blocks of proteins) in the diets of meat eaters, vegetarians, and vegans. They used a high standard that would cover the needs of pregnant women and growing children. All three diets provided MORE than enough protein, by double or more!
Other studies document that Americans are getting 150% to 400% more protein than they need. You can certainly eat plenty of dairy products (high in calcium) and have a calcium deficiency. How else are we the highest dairy-consuming nation in the world (by double the next-highest country) and also have the highest rate of osteoporosis? Fully half of us over the age of 60 get osteoporosis—and I believe that this already high number will grow dramatically as our soda-drinking youth age. The massive amount of animal protein we eat causes such an acidic state in the body that calcium from the bones is robbed in order to bring the blood and tissues into alkaline balance.
I seem to keep having conversations with powerlifter friends about this topic. I can be pretty persuasive, but getting competitive weight lifters to consider eating less meat and more plant food is like trying to tell a Catholic priest to quit going to Mass. What powerlifters do to build up huge pecs, lats, biceps and triceps muscles might win competitions, but it also accelerates aging, as well as disease risk. This week my friend Roy (who maxes the bench press with 455 lbs.) told me he’s on a 60% protein diet. While he’s thinking of his upcoming competition and fearing the ungodly carbohydrate, I’m thinking of the massive enzyme-draining load on his body.
Fact: Animal flesh and animal products may lead to quick muscle mass, but eating lots of animal flesh is a Faustian bargain: short-term gain for a steep long-term price. Protein powders and bars are a fad designed to increase protein intake beyond healthy ratios. A plant protein source is best and leads to long-lasting, slower-to-build but slower-to-degenerate muscle mass. A typical American 20 percent animal protein diet is linked to cancer, heart disease, autoimmune diseases, and many more risks.

Sunday, February 12, 2012

"Should sugar be regulated like a drug?"

this is an article I found at a really cool website called Food Matters
http://www.foodmatters.tv/_webapp_516271/Should_Sugar_be_Regulated_Like_a_Drug

'Sugar poses enough health risks that it should be considered a controlled substance just like alcohol and tobacco, contend a team of researchers from the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF).

In an opinion piece called “The Toxic Truth About Sugar” that was published Feb. 1 in the journal Nature, Robert Lustig, Laura Schmidt and Claire Brindis argue that it’s a misnomer to consider sugar just “empty calories.” They write: “There is nothing empty about these calories. A growing body of scientific evidence is showing that fructose can trigger processes that lead to liver toxicity and a host of other chronic diseases. A little is not a problem, but a lot kills — slowly.”

Almost everyone’s heard of — or personally experienced — the proverbial sugar high, so perhaps the comparison between sugar and alcohol or tobacco shouldn’t come as a surprise. But it’s doubtful that Americans will look favorably upon regulating their favorite vice. We’re a nation that’s sweet on sugar: the average U.S. adult downs 22 teaspoons of sugar a day, according to the American Heart Association, and surveys have found that teens swallow 34 teaspoons.

To counter our consumption, the authors advocate taxing sugary foods and controlling sales to kids under 17. Already, 17% of U.S. children and teens are obese, and across the world the sugar intake has tripled in the past 50 years. The increase has helped create a global obesity pandemic that contributes to 35 million annual deaths worldwide from noninfectious diseases including diabetes, heart disease and cancer.

“There are good calories and bad calories, just as there are good fats and bad fats, good amino acids and bad amino acids, good carbohydrates and bad carbohydrates,” Lustig, a professor of pediatrics and director of the Weight Assessment for Teen and Child Health (WATCH) program at UCSF, said in a statement. “But sugar is toxic beyond its calories.”

The food industry tries to imply that “a calorie is a calorie,” says Kelly Brownell, director of the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity at Yale University. “But this and other research suggests there is something different about sugar,” says Brownell.


(Ads Featuring Overweight Children Make Some Experts Uncomfortable)

The UCSF report emphasizes the metabolic effects of sugar. Excess sugar can alter metabolism, raise blood pressure, skew the signaling of hormones and damage the liver — outcomes that sound suspiciously similar to what can happen after a person drinks too much alcohol. Schmidt, co-chair of UCSF’s Community Engagement and Health Policy program, noted on CNN: “When you think about it, this actually makes a lot of sense. Alcohol, after all, is simply the distillation of sugar. Where does vodka come from? Sugar.”

But there are also other areas of impact that researchers have investigated: the effect of sugar on the brain and how liquid calories are interpreted differently by the body than solids. Research has suggested that sugar activates the same reward pathways in the brain as traditional drugs of abuse like morphine or heroin. No one is claiming the effect of sugar is quite that potent, but, says Brownell, “it helps confirm what people tell you anecdotally, that they crave sugar and have withdrawal symptoms when they stop eating it.”

There’s also something particularly insidious about sugary beverages. “When calories come in liquids, the body doesn’t feel as full,” says Brownell. “People are getting more of their calories than ever before from sugared beverages.”

Other countries, including France, Greece and Denmark, levy soda taxes, and the concept is being considered in at least 20 U.S. cities and states. Last summer, Philadelphia came close to passing a 2-cents-per-ounce soda tax. The Rudd Center has been a vocal proponent of a more modest 1-cent-per-ounce tax. But at least one study, from 2010, has raised doubts that soda taxes would result in significant weight loss: apparently people who are determined to eat — and drink — unhealthily will find ways to do it.

Ultimately, regulating sugar will prove particularly tricky because it transcends health concerns; sugar, for so many people, is love. A plate of cut-up celery just doesn’t pack the same emotional punch as a tin of homemade chocolate chip cookies, which is why I took my daughter for a cake pop and not an apple as an after-school treat today. We don’t do that regularly — it’s the first time this school year, actually — and that’s what made it special. As a society, could we ever reach the point where we’d think apples — not cake on a stick — are something to get excited over? Says Brindis, one of the report’s authors and director of UCSF’s Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies: “We recognize that there are cultural and celebratory aspects of sugar. Changing these patterns is very complicated.”

For inroads to be made, say the authors in their statement, people have to be better educated about the hazards of sugar and agree that something’s got to change:

Many of the interventions that have reduced alcohol and tobacco consumption can be models for addressing the sugar problem, such as levying special sales taxes, controlling access, and tightening licensing requirements on vending machines and snack bars that sell high sugar products in schools and workplaces.

“We’re not talking prohibition,” Schmidt said. “We’re not advocating a major imposition of the government into people’s lives. We’re talking about gentle ways to make sugar consumption slightly less convenient, thereby moving people away from the concentrated dose. What we want is to actually increase people’s choices by making foods that aren’t loaded with sugar comparatively easier and cheaper to get.”

Source: www.healthland.time.com/2012/02/02/...